Guardian360 vs Ceeyu
Works alongside Ceeyu
Guardian360 works alongside Ceeyu, covering the ground that vendor leaves open. A Belgian third-party-risk and attack-surface platform combining supplier questionnaires with external scanning, from EUR 245 a month.
What Ceeyu is good at
Ceeyu is the closest functional twin to our supplier-risk story, pairing questionnaire-based third-party risk with external attack-surface scanning, A-to-F ratings and a supplier portal. The product is live and self-serve and the company is a CRACY consortium member on the Cyber Resilience Act. Its strength is entirely supplier due diligence; on the technical half of a NIS2 conversation there is little there.
Side by side
How they compare
| Guardian360 | Ceeyu | |
|---|---|---|
| Company origin & data residency | Netherlands, EU-only | Belgium (Antwerp); 'stored in the EU', region not published |
| Partner model | Partner-only | No own partner page; Infinigate Belgium lists them, NL does not |
| Deployment approach | Agentless SaaS | Agentless; passive and active external scanning; SSO on Enterprise |
| Compliance coverage | 25+ frameworks, continuously mapped | Names NIS2, DORA, ISO 27001, NIST, CIS, CRA via CRACY |
| Intrusion detection | Built-in honeypots | No |
| Microsoft 365 insight | Included | Not published |
| Container & cloud scanning | Planned for 2026 | Cloud assets discovered only; no CSPM or container scanning |
| Mobile app | Yes (Android & iOS) | Not published |
| Automation & ease of use | High | Moderate; Kanban assessment board, automated scoring, A-F ratings |
| Pricing / MSP model | MSP pricing per employee / IP | Self-serve EUR 245 and EUR 595 a month; no MSP pricing |
| Auto-remediation | Partner-guided | Guided only; accept, false positive or remediated |
| Free trial / quick scan | Yes, incl. free WordPress plugin | Yes; self-serve trial |
| Smallest client size | From 10 employees / IPs | SME; no published floor |
| Data sovereignty (EU-only) | Yes | 'EU' asserted; no sub-processor list, DPA or region published |
| Supply-chain compliance | Yes, NIS2/Cbw + CRA questionnaires | Yes, and it is the whole product: questionnaires, supplier portal, fourth-party risk |
Based on publicly available information at the time of writing. Vendors evolve quickly, always verify the latest details with each provider.
When Ceeyu may fit better
An organisation whose entire need is third-party risk: supplier questionnaires, a supplier portal and fourth-party risk, bought self-serve at a published price.
When Guardian360 fits better
An organisation that also needs the technical half: Guardian360 Lighthouse scans continuously, adds honeypot detection and Microsoft 365 insight, and maps findings to 25+ frameworks including the Dutch norms, EU-hosted and partner-delivered, with supplier questionnaires alongside.
Common questions
Guardian360 vs Ceeyu, answered
Is Guardian360 an alternative to Ceeyu?
On supplier due diligence they overlap, and Ceeyu is strong there. Guardian360 Lighthouse covers the wider picture: continuous scanning, intrusion detection, Microsoft 365 insight and framework mapping including the Dutch norms, with supplier questionnaires as one part rather than the whole product.
What is the main difference?
Ceeyu is a third-party-risk platform with external scanning. Lighthouse is a compliance-centric assessment platform that scans the estate, detects intrusions and maps findings to frameworks, and also runs NIS2, Cbw and CRA supplier questionnaires.
See it on your own environment
Run a free Quickscan, start a trial, or talk to a partner. Guardian360 is delivered exclusively through our partners.